Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 01:51
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Hackers take aim at Washington Post journalists in an apparent ‘targeted’ cyberattack - CNN
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
FDA grants limited approval to new Covid vaccine from Moderna - NBC News
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
‘She never sleeps’: This platform wants to be OnlyFans for the AI era - CNN
Thank you.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Common herbal supplement used to beat stress linked to liver toxicity - Times of India
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ducks GM Pat Verbeek Discusses the Trade and What's Ahead for Anaheim - NHL.com
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.